Sitecore xDB - Troubleshooting xDB Index Rebuilds on Azure

In my previous post, I shared some important tips to help ensure that if you are faced with an xDB index rebuild, you can get it done successfully and as quickly as possible.

I mentioned a lot of things in the post, but now, I want to mention common reasons where and why things can go wrong, and highlight the most critical items that impact the rebuild speed and stability.

Causes of Need To Rebuild xDB Index

Your xDB relies on your shard database's SQL Server change tracking feature in order to ensure that it stays in sync. This basically determines how long changes are stored in SQL. As mentioned in Sitecore's docs, the Retention Period setting is set to 5 days for each collection shard. 

So, why would 5-day old data not be indexed in time?

• The Search Indexer is shut down for too long
• Live indexing is stuck for too long
• Live indexing falls too far behind

Causes of Indexing Being Stuck or Falling Behind, and Rebuild Failures

High Resource Utilization: Collection Shards 

99% of the time, this is due to high resource utilization on your shard databases. Basically, if you see your shard databases hitting above 80% DTUs, you will run into this problem.

High Resource Utilization: Azure Search or Solr

If you have a lot of data, you need to scale your Azure Search Service or Solr instance.  Sharding is the answer, and I will touch in this further down.

What to check?

If you are on Azure, make sure your xConnect Search Indexer WebJob is running.

Most importantly, check your xConnect Search Indexer logs for SQL timeouts. 

On Azure, the Webjob logs are found in this location: D:\local\Temp\jobs\continuous\IndexWorker\{randomjobname}\App_data\Logs"

Key Ingredients For Rebuild Indexing Speed and Stability

SQL Collection Shards

Database Health 

Maintaining the database indexes and statistics is critically important. As I mentioned in my previous post:  "Optimize, optimize, optimize your shard databases!!!" 

If you are preparing for a rebuild, make sure that you run the AzureSQLMaintenance Stored Procedure on all of your shard databases.

Database Size

The amount of data and the number of collection shards is directly related to resource utilization and rebuild speed and stability. 

Unfortunately, there is no supported way to "reshard" your databases after the fact. We are hoping this will be a feature that is added to a future Sitecore release.

xDB Search Index

Similarly to the collection shards, the amount of data and the number of shards is directly related to resource utilization on both Azure Search and Solr. 

Specifically on Solr, you will see high JVM heap utilization.

If your rebuilds are slowing down or failing, or even if search performance on your xDB index is deteriorating, it's most likely due to the amount of data in your index, the number of shards and distribution amongst nodes that you have set up.  

Search index sharding strategies can be pretty complex, and I might touch on in these in a later post.

Reduce Your Indexer Batch Size

Another item that I mentioned in my previous post. If you drop this down from 1000 to 500 and you are still having trouble, reduce it even further. 

I have dropped the batch size to 250 on large databases to reduce the chance of timeouts (default is 30 seconds) when the indexer is reading contacts and interactions from the collection shards.

Read More

Fix Email Campaign Pausing: Sitecore Email Experience Manager 3.x Retry Data Provider

Background

My company uses Email Experience Manager (EXM) to send several million emails a day, and we have been facing issues where our large campaigns would pause mid-send.

We have a scaled EXM environment with 2 dedicated dispatch servers, and a separate SQL Server, all with appropriate resources so the hardware was not an issue. We also ensured that databases were kept in tiptop condition (proper maintenance plans with stats being updated), and configurations where optimal for our environment.

The causing of the pausing

After digging in, I discovered that the pausing was caused by SQL deadlocks due to the massive amount of records and CRUD activity on the EXM SQL databases.

Sample Exception:

 ERROR Transaction (Process ID 116) was deadlocked on lock | communication buffer resources with another process and has been chosen as the deadlock victim. Rerun the transaction.  
 Exception: System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException  
 Message: Transaction (Process ID 116) was deadlocked on lock | communication buffer resources with another process and has been chosen as the deadlock victim. Rerun the transaction.  
 Source: .Net SqlClient Data Provider  
   at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnection.OnError(SqlException exception, Boolean breakConnection, Action`1 wrapCloseInAction)  
   at System.Data.SqlClient.TdsParser.ThrowExceptionAndWarning(TdsParserStateObject stateObj, Boolean callerHasConnectionLock, Boolean asyncClose)  
   at System.Data.SqlClient.TdsParser.TryRun(RunBehavior runBehavior, SqlCommand cmdHandler, SqlDataReader dataStream, BulkCopySimpleResultSet bulkCopyHandler, TdsParserStateObject stateObj, Boolean& dataReady)  
   at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlDataReader.TryHasMoreRows(Boolean& moreRows)  
   at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlDataReader.TryReadInternal(Boolean setTimeout, Boolean& more)  
   at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlDataReader.Read()  
   at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlCommand.CompleteExecuteScalar(SqlDataReader ds, Boolean returnSqlValue)  
   at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlCommand.ExecuteScalar()  
   at Sitecore.Modules.EmailCampaign.Core.Data.SqlDbEcmDataProvider.CountRecipientsInDispatchQueue(Guid messageId, RecipientQueue[] queueStates)  
   at Sitecore.Modules.EmailCampaign.Core.Gateways.DefaultEcmDataGateway.CountRecipientsInDispatchQueue(Guid messageId, RecipientQueue[] queueStates)  
   at Sitecore.Modules.EmailCampaign.Core.Analytics.MessageStatistics.get_Unprocessed()  
   at Sitecore.Modules.EmailCampaign.Core.Analytics.MessageStatistics.get_Processed()  
   at Sitecore.Modules.EmailCampaign.Core.MessageStateInfo.InitializeSendingState()  
   at Sitecore.Modules.EmailCampaign.Core.MessageStateInfo.InitializeMessageStateInfo()  
   at Sitecore.Modules.EmailCampaign.Factory.GetMessageStateInfo(String messageItemId, String contextLanguage)  
   at Sitecore.EmailCampaign.Server.Services.MessageInfoService.Get(String messageId, String contextLanguage)  
   at Sitecore.EmailCampaign.Server.Controllers.MessageInfo.MessageInfoController.MessageInfo(MessageInfoContext data)  
   

How does this new data provider fix the problem?

The new data provider introduces efficient SQL deadlock handling. When a deadlock is detected, it will wait 5 seconds and then retry the transaction. The code will try to execute a deadlocked transaction 3 times.

Configuration

Defaults are set to wait 5 seconds for the retry, and the max retry attempts is 3. The DelaySeconds and RetryCount settings can be modified to suit your needs.

 <configuration xmlns:patch="http://www.sitecore.net/xmlconfig/">  
  <sitecore>  
   <ecmDataProvider defaultProvider="sqlretry">  
    <providers>  
     <clear/>  
     <add name="sqlretry" type="Sitecore.EmailCampaign.RetryDataProvider.RetrySqlDbEcmDataProvider, Sitecore.EmailCampaign.RetryDataProvider" connectionStringName="exm.master">  
      <Logger type="Sitecore.ExM.Framework.Diagnostics.Logger, Sitecore.ExM.Framework" factoryMethod="get_Instance"/>  
      <DelaySeconds>5</DelaySeconds>  
      <RetryCount>3</RetryCount>  
     </add>  
     <add name="sqlbase" type="Sitecore.Modules.EmailCampaign.Core.Data.SqlDbEcmDataProvider, Sitecore.EmailCampaign" connectionStringName="exm.master">  
      <Logger type="Sitecore.ExM.Framework.Diagnostics.Logger, Sitecore.ExM.Framework" factoryMethod="get_Instance"/>  
     </add>  
    </providers>  
   </ecmDataProvider>  
  </sitecore>  
 </configuration>  

Source Code and Documentation

Full source code, documentation and package download is available from my GitHub repository:

https://github.com/martinrayenglish/Sitecore-EXM-3.x-Retry-Data-Provider

Read More

Sitecore Publishing Service - Publishing Sub Items of Related Items

Background

We ran into an issue with our Sitecore 9.1 and Publishing Service 4.0 environment where when a page item with a rendering was being published, the corresponding data source of the rendering was not published fully.

To be more specific, if the rendering referred to a data source item that had multiple levels of items, then only the root of the data source was being published but not the child items.

A good example would be a navigation rendering that had a data source item with a lot of children. Content authors were making updates to all the link items within Experience Editor, but they were not being published.

This was happening for both manual publishing and publishing through workflow.

Configuration Updates

In our research, we discovered that publishing service allows you to specify the templates of the items you wish to publish as descendants of related items. 

Adding the following node to sc.publishing.relateditems.xml did trick (after a restart):

It is very important to note that the the template nodes need to have unique names in order for this to work. 

In other words: DatasourceTemplate1, DatasourceTemplate2, DatasourceTemplate3 etc. 

So as you can imagine, if you want to include a lot of data source item templates, the list in your configuration can get extremely large!

Final Words

I hope that this information helps developers who face a similar issue, as I could not find anything online about this related publishing configuration.

As always, feel free to comment or reach me on Slack or Twitter if you have any questions.                                                    

Read More

Sitecore PowerShell Extensions - Find Content Items Missing From Sitecore Indexe

Over the course of the last month, we ran into data inconsistencies between what was in our content databases compared to our Solr indexes.

We have content authors from around the globe and content creation happens around the clock by authors via the Experience Editor and imports via external sources.

Illegal Characters Causing Index Issues

As mentioned by this KB article https://kb.sitecore.net/articles/592127, index documents are submitted Solr in XML format, and if your content contains and “illegal” characters that cannot be converted to XML, all documents in the batch submission will fail.  

When you perform an index rebuild or re-index a portion of your tree, Sitecore will submit 100 documents in a batch to Solr. How is the related to the character issue? If you perform an index rebuild and have a single bad character in one of your items in the batch, none of the 100 docs in that batch will make it into your Solr index. 

What makes this especially difficult to troubleshoot is that item batches contain different items every time. So, what could be missing from your index during one rebuild, could be different during the next rebuild.  

There is a good Stack Exchange article that explains all of this, and kudos to Anders Laub who provides a pretty decent fix for this issue: https://sitecore.stackexchange.com/questions/18832/wildly-inconsistent-index-data-after-rebuilds 

PowerShell Index Item Check Script

There are several other reasons why content could be missing from your Sitecore Indexes, and so I needed to come up with a way to identify would could be missing.

PowerShell Extensions for the win!

I decided to create a PowerShell script to do just that - check for items in a selected target database that are missing in selected index, and produce a downloadable report.

What’s nice is that I strapped on an interactive dialog making it friendly for Authors or DevOps to make their comparison selections.

If you are newish to PowerShell Extensions, this could also help you understand how powerful it truly is, and serve as a guide to build your own scripts that you can use daily!

Read More

The Curious Case of Sitecore's Enforce Version Presence Permission Denied

Background

I ran into a perplexing enforce version presence & language fallback issue that I wanted to share so that others won't have to go down the same rabbit hole as I did to uncover the underlying issue.

Language, Fallback and Version Presence Config

Our site is configured for almost 3 dozen languages, and as you can image, we rely on language fallback a lot!  

Language fallback works by displaying a fallback version of a language item when there is no version available in the current language context. 

So if you got to https://www.mysite.com/de-de/mypage and there isn't a German version available for that page, it will instead render the English version (if one exists) at the url.

Now, let's say that you don't have an English version for that particular page either. So, there is only a Dutch version of the page available at https://www.mysite.com/nl-nl/mypage. Then you go to the German url https://www.mysite.com/de-de/mypage. Since there isn't any fallback English version available, you would expect to see a 404 response right?

To set this up, the item would need to have both "Enable Item Fallback", and "Enforce Version Presence" enabled at its item level. The recommended way to do this is by setting these values on the template Standard Values.

Finally, you would need to set fallback and version presence on your site configuration. If you are using SXA, you would enable so this under the /sitecore/content/TenantFolder/TenantName/SiteName/Settings/Site Grouping/SiteName item.

In "Other Properties", you set "enforceVersionPresence" set to true:

Problematic Results

Initially, this seemed to work as expected. 

Referencing the example again: We only had a single language version of the item, and nothing else (not even the English fallback). The Dutch version of the page was available at https://www.mysite.com/nl-nl/mypage and then accessing any other language url https://www.mysite.com/de-de/mypage or https://www.mysite.com/en/mypage we would see the expected 404.

Over time we discovered "Permission to the requested document was denied" issues started bubbling up all over the place for our items that were supposed to fallback. Initially, this seemed to be random: different users would access the same url, and some would experience the permission denied message, while the fallback and content would be resolved without issue for others.

Investigation

This was very tricky reproduce in a scaled environment.  In our investigation, we discovered the following scenario:

1. Create any page in a non-english version only.

2. Save and publish the page.
3. Access the page url in any other language version that does not exist for that item. 

    3.1 404 for that item is returned.

4. On the same server, try and access the page url in a different language version that does not exist for that item. 

    4.1. "Permission to the requested document was denied" is returned.

5. Clearing the AccessResult cache and first accessing the item in number 4 above that didn't previously work, would make it work. Trying to access the item in number 3 above that worked previously would then throw the permission denied error.

Perplexing right?

Let me provide a more specific example:

• A Dutch version of the page was available at https://www.mysite.com/nl-nl/mypage 
• Accessed the page via the German url https://www.mysite.com/de-de/mypage
• The expected 404 for the item is returned.
• On the same server, access the English page url via  https://www.mysite.com/en/mypage
• "Permission to the requested document was denied" is returned.

Root Cause

The support team confirmed this critical bug in the Sitecore.Kernel that is present in all recent Sitecore versions.

The piece of code responsible for the permission denied error as:

Regardless of the value that is returned for the checks, the key/value combo is stored in AccessResultCache.

Next time the item is requested it is served from this cache, the permission denied error is thrown.

Fix Forthcoming

Due to the critically of this bug, the product team is working on the fix. Once ready, and it has gone through our own QA cycles, I intend to post an update with more information about it.

Read More

Sitecore Azure PaaS - Fixing "No owin.Environment item was found in the context" When Application Initialization Configured

Background

On Azure PaaS, it is well known that Application Initialization can assist in “warming up” your Sitecore application when scaling up or swapping slots, so that your App Services instances aren't thrown into rotation to receive traffic when they aren't ready. 

Unfortunately, since Sitecore 9.1, there is a nasty Owin error that prevents this from working correctly and this in turn impacts the healthy signaling of your App Services. 

Strangely, the error would disappear after about 2 minutes.

Sitecore Support Response

After talking with Sitecore Support engineers, they ended up telling us that using <applicationInitialization> had not been tested for Sitecore, and that they don't have any official guidelines on configuring Azure App Initialization.

Finally, they said that they were not able to provide us with any assistance.

Cause

I started deciphering the problem on my own. 

Looking at this error, the key to understand its root was on line 6: the BeginDiagnostics processor.

1:  [InvalidOperationException: No owin.Environment item was found in the context.]  
2:    System.Web.HttpContextExtensions.GetOwinContext(HttpContext context) +100  
3:    Sitecore.Owin.Authentication.Publishing.PreviewManager.get_User() +15  
4:    Sitecore.Owin.Authentication.Publishing.PreviewManager.GetShellUser() +23  
5:    Sitecore.Pipelines.HttpRequest.BeginDiagnostics.ResolveUser() +41  
6:    Sitecore.Pipelines.HttpRequest.BeginDiagnostics.Process(HttpRequestArgs args) +43  
7:    (Object , Object ) +15  

The BeginDiagnostics processor in the httpRequestBegin pipeline is used for Sitecore's diagnostic tools. This determines what happens if you try to run in Debug Mode in the page editor.

In this case, the PreviewManager User property was trying to return the HttpContext.Current.User which was not available yet, and was returning null and the error “No owin. Environment item was found in the context.” was thrown.

The Fix

After determining what was causing this error, the fix was simple. The processor isn't needed on Content Delivery instances as Debug Mode is only used on the Content Management instances.

Removing the processor via a simple patch fixed the error:

Read More

Sitecore xDB - Extending xConnect To Reduce xDB Index Sizes And Rebuild Times

Background

In my previous post, I write about how you can extend the xConnect Data Adapter Provider to prevent unwanted data from being written to your shard databases.

But, what if you already have a lot of analytics and contact data in your shards, have an xDB index issue, and are struggling to rebuild your index?  

Or, what if you want to keep the data in your databases just in case you may need it some time in the future but want to lighten the load on your xDB index to improve performance?

In this post, I will show you how to filter data from your xDB index to reduce the index size and growth rate. This will also improve your rebuild times tremendously.

You can also skip ahead and check out the full source code for my example on my GitHub repo: https://github.com/martinrayenglish/Test.SCExtensions

Business Scenario

In a 9.1 project, I was faced with a very slow rebuild times, where it was literally taking weeks to rebuild our xDB index. I was very concerned with the amount of data we were ingesting into the xDB index from the shard databases, specifically the rate at which interactions where being added. I have an older post this talks about this topic, so give it a read if you have not already.

Prior to 9.2, there is no true supported way to purge old interaction data, and so I was faced with the question of how I could reduce the amount of interaction data that our xDB index contained, and preventing our business from being paralyzed for weeks waiting for a rebuild to complete in the future.

Solving The Problem

As sheer quantity of interactions was the problem, I wanted to be able to filter both new and existing interactions from being brought in from the shard databases during a rebuild or after the session end data aggregation process.

Round 1

In my initial exploration, I focused on customizing the index writer code as that seemed to be the sweet spot.  The code below shows an example of where I customized it to remove ALL interactions from making their way to the xDB index (see line 28 where I simply new up a new blank list of InteractionDataRecord objects):

To apply the updated writer, I put the new assembly into
{xconnect}\bin
and
{xconnect}\App_data\jobs\continuous\IndexWorker

 and then updated the XML files to use new writer in {xconnect}\App_data\jobs\continuous\IndexWorker\App_data\Config\Sitecore\SearchIndexer\sc.Xdb.Collection.IndexWriter.Solr.xml
and
{xconnect}\App_data\config\sitecore\SearchIndexer\sc.Xdb.Collection.IndexWriter.Solr.xml

 <IIndexWriter>  
         <Type>Test.SCExtensions.Xdb.Collection.Search.Solr, Test.SCExtensions</Type>  
         <As>Sitecore.Xdb.Collection.Indexing.IIndexWriter, Sitecore.Xdb.Collection</As>  
         <LifeTime>Singleton</LifeTime>  
  </IIndexWriter>  

This worked well for new interactions coming in from the shard databases after session end, but did not work for rebuild operations so I needed to explore further.

Round 2

The problem that I discovered after my initial try, was that the SolrWriter type specified above is not used by the rebuilder because of the dependency injection implementation details. so writing the custom implementation of the rebuilder class was not a valid option.

I started looking into other options to override the related logic.

After investigating further, I discovered that a custom implementation of both the IndexRebuilderFilter and IndexWriterFilter would take care of both new interactions from sessions and existing interactions coming in via a rebuild operation.  

I created 2 new classes to perform these tasks that I used to decorate the related interface. 

Again, in these examples, I am removing ALL interactions from my xDB index. In a real world scenario, it would be best to filter based on analytics data that is valuable to your business so that it will be available via the xDB search API. 

I show you how to do this further down in my post: More Bang - Selective xDB Index Filtering.

Next, I created decorator XML configs to allow xConnect to use my new writer extension code.

Rebuilder writer config location: {xconnect}\App_Data\jobs\continuous\IndexWorker\App_data\config\sitecore\SearchIndexer\sc.Xdb.Collection.Indexing.IndexRebuilderFilterDecorator.xml

 <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>  
 <Settings>  
   <Sitecore>  
     <XConnect>  
       <SearchIndexer>  
         <Services>  
           <IIndexRebuilderFilterDecorator>  
             <Type>Sitecore.XConnect.Configuration.ServiceDecorator`2[[Sitecore.Xdb.Collection.Indexing.IIndexRebuilder, Sitecore.Xdb.Collection], [Test.SCExtensions.Xdb.Collection.Search.Solr.IndexRebuilderFilterDecorator, Test.SCExtensions]], Sitecore.XConnect.Configuration</Type>  
             <LifeTime>Singleton</LifeTime>  
           </IIndexRebuilderFilterDecorator>  
         </Services>  
       </SearchIndexer>  
     </XConnect>  
   </Sitecore>  
 </Settings>  

Writer config location: {xconnect}\App_Data\jobs\continuous\IndexWorker\App_data\config\sitecore\SearchIndexer\sc.Xdb.Collection.Indexing.IndexWriterFilterDecorator.xml

 <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>  
 <Settings>  
   <Sitecore>  
     <XConnect>  
       <SearchIndexer>  
         <Services>  
           <IIndexWriterFilterDecorator>  
             <Type>Sitecore.XConnect.Configuration.ServiceDecorator`2[[Sitecore.Xdb.Collection.Indexing.IIndexWriter, Sitecore.Xdb.Collection], [Test.SCExtensions.Xdb.Collection.Search.Solr.IndexWriterFilterDecorator, Test.SCExtensions]], Sitecore.XConnect.Configuration</Type>  
             <LifeTime>Singleton</LifeTime>  
           </IIndexWriterFilterDecorator>  
         </Services>  
       </SearchIndexer>  
     </XConnect>  
   </Sitecore>  
 </Settings>  

After applying these updates, I was able to successful filter interactions coming from the shard databases to my xDB index during both rebuilds and session ends!

More Bang - Selective xDB Index Filtering

As you don't necessarily want to remove all interactions from the xDB index unless you are in dire straights, I added a new class for filtering interactions based on specific events. In other words, if an interaction has an event in it that we care about, we allow it to go into the index.

By using this example, you can lighten your index, and still include interactions that are important to you for personalization etc. 

This full source code for this example can be found on my GitHub repo: https://github.com/martinrayenglish/Test.SCExtensions

Read More